期刊
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 211, 期 -, 页码 125-135出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.083
关键词
Integrated biofilter; Sulfur; Pyrite; Autotrophic denitrification; Clone library; Microbial diversity
资金
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [51578519]
- Foundation of China Scholarship Council [[2015]3022]
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21307117]
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2652013058]
Two parallel biofilters applying sulfur/pyrite-based autotrophic denitrification were investigated for removing COD, TP and TN by a coordinated process. Results demonstrated good performance by removing 86.32% vs 87.14% COD and 92.56% vs 89.65% NH4+-N. Biofilter with sulfur (BS) was superior on nitrate (89.74% vs 80.72%) and TN removal (83.18% vs 70.42%) while biofilter with pyrite (BP) was better on TP removal (82.58% vs 77.40%) and maintaining sulfate (27.56 mg L-1 vs 41.55 mg L-1) and pH (7.13 vs 6.31). Water-permeable adsorbents lowered clogging risk and buffered loading. Clone library revealed reasons of diversities, pH variation and sulfate accumulation of both biofilters. Sulfur was efficient on denitrification but whose byproducts were troublesome, pyrite produced less byproduct but which was sensitive to organics. This research was the first attempt to systematically compare two promising alternatives and their merits/demerits for rural wastewater on-site treatment. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据