4.5 Article

Dendritic cell exosome-shuttled miRNA146a regulates exosome-induced endothelial cell inflammation by inhibiting IRAK-1: A feedback control mechanism

期刊

MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS
卷 20, 期 6, 页码 5315-5323

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2019.10749

关键词

dendritic cells; exosomes; miRNA146a; endothelial inflammation; IRAK-1

资金

  1. Grants of Shanghai Sailing Program [16YF1401600]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC1301200]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [81770350]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activation of endothelial cells is the first step of atherosclerosis. The current authors have previously reported that exosomes from mature dendritic cells (mDC-exo) participate in endothelial inflammation and atherosclerosis through membrane tumor necrosis factor-alpha mediated the nuclear factor (NF)-kappa B signaling pathway. However, whether mDC-exo shuttled microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs) play a role in endothelial inflammation remains unknown. In this study, mDC-exo were co-cultured with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and the expression of adhesion molecules, such as vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and E-Selectin was investigated. Then the expression of miRNAs in DC-exo was explored and the role of miR-146a in endothelial inflammation was investigated. mDC-exos were first demonstrated to increase endothelial expression of adhesion molecules through a quick activation of the NF-kappa B signaling pathway. Then it was demonstrated that HUVECs resistant to a second stimulation after the first stimulation by mDC-exo. A set of miRNAs were targeted and their expression in HUVECs stimulated with mDC-exo was measured. Finally, it was confirmed that mDC-exo shuttles miR-146a into HUVECs and the shuttled miR-146a contributes to protect HUVECs from a second stimulation through inhibiting interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase. These data suggest a negative feedback loop of inflammation regulation by DC-exo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据