4.5 Article

Loneliness Increases the Risk of All-Cause Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbz139

关键词

Living alone; Longitudinal; Risk factors; Social isolation; Social relationship

资金

  1. Wallenberg Scholar Grant from Knut and Alice Wallenberg's Foundation
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare [2013 - 2056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To examine the effect of perceived loneliness on the development of dementia (all-cause), Alzheimer ' s disease (AD), and vascular dementia (VaD). Method: The study comprised 1,905 nondemented participants at baseline, drawn from the longitudinal Betula study in Sweden, with a follow-up time of up to 20 years (mean 11.1 years). Loneliness was measured with a single question: Do you often feel lonely?. Results: During the follow-up, 428 developed dementia; 221 had AD, 157 had VaD, and 50 had dementia of other subtypes. The entire dementia group is denoted all-cause dementia. Cox regression models, adjusted for age, gender, and a baseline report of perceived loneliness, showed increased risk of all-cause dementia (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-1.89), and AD (HR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.20-2.37), but not VaD (HR = 1.34, 95% CI 0.87-2.08). After adjusting for a range of potential confounders, and excluding participants with dementia onset within the first 5 years of baseline (to consider the possibility of reverse causality), the increased risk for the development of all-cause dementia and AD still remained significant (HR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.01-2.25 for all-cause dementia; HR = 2.50, 95% CI 1.44-4.36 for AD). Discussion: The results suggest that perceived loneliness is an important risk factor for all-cause dementia and especially for AD, but not for VaD. These results underscore the importance of paying attention to subjective reports of loneliness among the elderly adults and identifying potential intervention strategies that can reduce loneliness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据