4.6 Article

Nudging healthy and sustainable food choices: three randomized controlled field experiments using a vegetarian lunch-default as a normative signal

期刊

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 43, 期 2, 页码 392-397

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz154

关键词

behaviour; environment; food and nutrition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Changing the default lunch option to vegetarian is an effective, generic, easy to scale, and well-accepted nudge to promote healthy and sustainable food choices at conferences. Results showed a significant increase in vegetarian choices and a tendency for men to opt out of the vegetarian default, while most participants reported positive attitudes towards this nudge.
Background This study investigates a simple, generic and easily scalable nudge to promote healthy and sustainable food choices at conferences by using a vegetarian lunch-default as a normative signal. Methods At three conferences, participants registering electronically were randomized into two groups: Group 1 received a standard lunch registration presenting a non-vegetarian buffet as the default, but allowing the active choice of a vegetarian option; Group 2 received a registration presenting a vegetarian buffet as the default, allowing the active choice of a non-vegetarian option. The study also assessed gender differences for two of the conferences and the participants' acceptance of the nudge at one of the conferences. Results In experiment A the vegetarian choice increased from 2% to 87% (N = 108, P < 0.001). In experiment B it increased from 6% to 86% (N = 112, P < 0.001). In experiment C it increased from 12.5% to 89% (N = 110, P < 0.001). A significant tendency for men, but not women, to opt out of the vegetarian default was found and a clear majority of participants reported positive attitudes toward the nudge. Conclusions Changing the lunch-default to a vegetarian option is an effective, generic, easy to scale and well-accepted nudge to promote healthy and sustainable food choices at conferences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据