4.7 Article

Mutual effect of U(VI) and phosphate on the reactivity of nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) for their co-removal

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 297, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111853

关键词

nZVI; U(VI); Phosphate; Co-removal

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21976184, 21477133]
  2. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M652228]
  3. Special Foundation for Young Scientists of Key Lab of Photovoltaic and Energy Conservation Materials [PECL2018QN004]
  4. Research Fund Program of Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Radionuclides Pollution Control and Resources [20178030314182]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) has been widely considered as a promising permeable barrier material for remediating U(VI)-contaminated waters. Little information is available regarding co-removal of U(VI) and oxyanion contaminants by nZVI, yet in the majority of areas polluted by U(VI), co-existence of phosphate is found to be common especially in eutrophic water. Herein, the mutual influence of U(VI) and phosphate on the effectiveness of nZVI in co-removing U(VI) and phosphate is investigated by macroscopic and microscopic approach. The results indicate that nZVI can effectively co-remove U(VI) and phosphate and the processes intensively depend on the solution pH and the additional order due to the formation of nZVI-U(VI)-phosphate complexes and will change the morphology of nZVI through the formation of a new phase. Furthermore, the maximum removal capacity of nZVI increases by 21.63% at pH 6.0 for U(VI) ions and by 34.28% at pH 7.0 for phosphate when both U(VI) and phosphate are present simultaneously. In short, the co-presence of U(VI) and phosphate has a great impact on the reactivity and morphology of nZVI. The findings will be beneficial to broaden the potential feasibility of nZVI in simultaneous radionuclide and phosphate pollution cleanup. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据