4.5 Article

Fire suppression efficiency of water mists containing organic solvents

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103973

关键词

Fire suppression; Water mist containing organic solvent; Fire-extinguishing agent; Firefighting; Additive to water; Extinguishing time

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP19H02387]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the fire-suppression ability of water mists containing various organic solvents-ethanol, 1-propanol, tetrahydrofuran, methyl acetate, and 1,2-dimethyoxyethane-which form minimum-boiling azeotropic mixtures with water. The key factors influencing the suppression efficiencies of the solvent-containing water mists were elucidated by measuring the evaporation rates, flash points, extinguishing times, and spray properties (droplet-size distribution, spray mass-flux density, and droplet velocity) of the mists. Suppression trials indicated that (i) heptane pool fires can be extinguished by aqueous solutions of ethanol and 1-propanol at solvent concentrations of 1.0-20.0 vol%, but are not consistently extinguished by the other three solvents, and (ii) the extinguishing times of aqueous ethanol and 1-propanol (despite their high flammability) are significantly shorter than those of a wet chemical (i.e., conventional fire-extinguishing agent). In a stepwise regression analysis, the fire-suppression abilities of water mists containing ethanol and 1-propanol were positively related to the spray flux density, spray velocity, and flash point, enabling an estimation of the extinguishing times. A correlation analysis demonstrated that a faster evaporation rate improves the fire-suppression ability. The results confirmed that ethanol and 1-propanol are effective additives to fire-extinguishing water mists. The study findings provide useful insights into the development of new water-mist fire suppressants, potentially making a large contribution to the reduction of fire-related fatalities and economic losses in industries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据