4.7 Article

Susceptibility of atrazine photo-degradation in the presence of nitrate: Impact of wavelengths and significant role of reactive nitrogen species

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 388, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121760

关键词

UV wavelength; Nitrate photolysis; Atrazine; Reactive nitrogen species

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51878256, 51878257]
  2. UCAS Joint PhD Training Program
  3. University of Cincinnati through a UNESCO
  4. Herman Schneider Professorship in the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of reactive nitrogen species (RNS) formed from nitrate photolysis has aroused interests in transformation of contaminants of emerging concern. This study investigated the influence of UV wavelengths (255, 285 and 365 nm) on photolysis of nitrate for degradation of atrazine (ATZ). The UV285/nitrate system showed the fastest rate constant for degradation of ATZ with k(obs) of 0.0022 cm(2) mJ(-1). UV photolysis, RNS, and hydroxyl radical (HO) were identified as main contributors to ATZ degradation in UV/nitrate system. Among the contributors, RNS made the major contribution to degradation of ATZ in UV(28)5/nitrate system, while HO is the predominant specie in UV255/nitrate system. Variance decomposition analysis showed that degradation of ATZ was slightly impacted by natural organic matter and carbonate/bicarbonate in UV285/nitrate system but was dramatically affected in UV255/nitrate system. Main transformation products of ATZ in UV285/nitrate system were identified and possible pathways were proposed. RNS were confirmed to be favorable for acceleration of ATZ photolysis through further reaction of RNS with hydroxyatrazine (with electron-rich moieties). Our study provides deep insights on the influence of UV wavelength on nitrate photolysis and ATZ degradation, and provides a novel method for remediation of water co-contaminated by nitrate and organic contaminants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据