4.7 Article

Parametrization of halogen bonds in the CHARMM general force field: Improved treatment of ligand-protein interactions

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 24, 期 20, 页码 4812-4825

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2016.06.034

关键词

Sigma hole; Halogen bond; CHARMM; Halogen; Drug design; CGenFF

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM070855, GM072558, GM037554, F32GM109632]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A halogen bond is a highly directional, non-covalent interaction between a halogen atom and another electronegative atom. It arises due to the formation of a small region of positive electrostatic potential opposite the covalent bond to the halogen, called the 'sigma hole.' Empirical force fields in which the electrostatic interactions are represented by atom-centered point charges cannot capture this effect because halogen atoms usually carry a negative charge and therefore interact unfavorably with other electronegative atoms. A strategy to overcome this problem is to attach a positively charged virtual particle to the halogen. In this work, we extend the additive CHARMM General Force Field (CGenFF) to include such interactions in model systems of phenyl-X, with X being Cl, Br or I including di- and trihalogenated species. The charges, Lennard-Jones parameters, and halogen-virtual particle distances were optimized to reproduce the orientation dependence of quantum mechanical interaction energies with water, acetone, and N-methylacetamide as well as experimental pure liquid properties and relative hydration free energies with respect to benzene. The resulting parameters were validated in molecular dynamics simulations on small-molecule crystals and on solvated protein-ligand complexes containing halogenated compounds. The inclusion of positive virtual sites leads to better agreement across experimental observables, including preservation of ligand binding poses as a direct result of the improved representation of halogen bonding. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据