4.7 Article

Saltatory rolling circle amplification for sensitive visual detection of Staphylococcus aureus in milk

期刊

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
卷 102, 期 11, 页码 9702-9710

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-16724

关键词

saltatory rolling circle amplification (SRCA); Staphylococcus aureus; visualization; detection

资金

  1. Key Research and Development Project of Hebei Province [18275501D]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31371772]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [C2019204342, C2017204027]
  4. Scientific Research Program of Hebei Education Department [ZD2017237]
  5. Program of Introduced Doctor of Hebei Agricultural University [ZD201623]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monitoring Staphylococcus aureus with high sensitivity is very important for ensuring milk quality and food safety. In this study, we used a rapid nucleic acid isothermal amplification method, saltatory rolling circle amplification (SRCA), for the detection of Staph. aureus in milk. The results of the SRCA method can be assessed visually by the presence of white precipitate or by fluorescence measurement. Thirteen Staph. aureus strains and 31 non-Staph. aureus strains were used to evaluate the specificity of SRCA. The method exhibited excellent detection of Staph. aureus genomic DNA at a concentration of 7.8 x 10(1) fg/mu L when assessed by visible precipitate, and at 7.8 x 10(0) fg/mu L when detected by fluorescence after addition of the fluorochrome SYBR Green I. In artificially inoculated milk, the detection limits of SRCA were 5.6 x 10(2) cfu/mL by precipitate and 5.6 x 10(1) cfu/mL by fluorescence, respectively. Compared with conventional PCR approaches, the SRCA assay achieved at least 100-fold higher sensitivity. Moreover, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the SRCA-based system were calculated to be 100.00, 97.73, and 97.78%, respectively. These results indicate that SRCA has potential application as a sensitive and visual technique for the detection of Staph. aureus in milk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据