4.7 Article

The 5-aromatic hydantoin-3-acetate derivatives as inhibitors of the tumour multidrug resistance efflux pump P-glycoprotein (ABCB1): Synthesis, crystallographic and biological studies

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 24, 期 12, 页码 2815-2822

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2016.04.055

关键词

Derivatives of hydantoin; Multidrug resistance inhibitors; Crystal structure; P-glycoprotein (ABCB1)

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund of the Polish Innovation Economy Operational Program [POIG.02.01.00-12-023/08]
  2. Polish programs of statutory research (Jagiellonian University-Medical College) [K/ZDS/005593, K/ZDS/004689]
  3. Pedagogical University of Cracow

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of arylpiperazine derivatives of hydantoin-3-acetate, including previously obtained 5,5-diphenylhydantoin (1-7) and new-synthesized spirofluorene-hydantoin derivatives (8-12), were investigated in the search for new inhibitors of the tumour multidrug resistance (MDR) efflux pump P-glycoprotein (P-gp, ABCB1) overexpressed in mouse T-lymphoma cells. Synthesis of new compounds (8-12) was performed. Crystal structures of two compounds (8 and 11) were determined by X-ray diffraction method. The conformations of the investigated molecules (8 and 11) in the crystalline samples are different. The bent conformation seems to be more favourable for biological activity than the extended one. The efflux pump inhibitory properties of the compounds 1-12 were evaluated in the fluorescence uptake assay using rhodamine 123 dye in mouse T-lymphoma model in vitro. Their cytotoxic action was examined, too. All compounds with methyl acetate moiety displayed high potency to inhibit the MDR efflux pump. The most active compound, methyl 2-(1-(4-(4-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl) butyl)-5,5-diphenylhydantoin-3-yl)acetate (5), tested at 1/10 of verapamil concentration displayed the 9-fold higher P-gp inhibitory action. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据