4.2 Review

The Pathophysiology of Myocardial Ischemia and Perioperative Myocardial Infarction

期刊

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.10.005

关键词

pathophysiology; acute coronary syndrome; stable angina; peri-operative myocardial infarction; myocardial injury after non cardiac surgery

资金

  1. Jan Pretorius Research Fund, South African Society of Anesthesiologists

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ischemic heart disease, the leading cause of death worldwide, may result in devastating perioperative ischemia and infarction. The underlying pathophysiology, precipitating factors, and approach to prevention differ between patients presenting for noncardiac surgery, developing acute coronary syndrome versus stable angina. The first half of this article reviews the pathophysiology of acute coronary syndrome and stable angina. Acute coronary syndrome, otherwise known as Type 1 myocardial infarction, includes unstable angina, non-ST segment elevated myocardial infarction and ST segment elevated myocardial infarction. Acute coronary syndrome occurs as a result of vulnerable plaque rupture with subsequent varying degrees of thrombus formation, arterial spasm, and thus coronary occlusion. Stable angina, on the other hand, results from a myocardial oxygen delivery and demand mismatch in the setting of fixed coronary stenosis. After this discussion, the review article considers how both apply to perioperative myocardial infarctions and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery. This article furthermore argues why myocardial oxygen delivery demand mismatch (Type 2) myocardial infarction is the most likely underlying pathophysiology responsible for perioperative myocardial infarctions. Being aware of this and knowledgeable about Type 2 infarctions may enable anesthetic providers to better predict the majority of triggers contributing to, and thus decreasing the incidence of, perioperative myocardial infarctions. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据