4.7 Article

Temperature prediction by a fractional heat conduction model for the bi-layered spherical tissue in the hyperthermia experiment

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2019.105990

关键词

Fractional heat conduction; Bi-layered spherical tissue; Finite difference; Conjugate gradient method; Fractional sensitivity equation

资金

  1. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [ZR2017MA030]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018T110679, 2016M602127]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11771254, 11672163]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a novel time-fractional heat conduction model is presented for the bi-layered spherical tissue in the hyperthermia experiment, and an efficient numerical technique to estimate the unknown fractional parameter in the proposed time-fractional heat conduction model is investigated. Firstly, for the solution of the proposed time-fractional heat conduction model, the technique of variable transformation and the implicit finite difference method are employed. Secondly, based on the measured experimental data, an efficient numerical technique to estimate the unknown order of the fractional derivative is investigated. The fractional sensitivity equation is first obtained by means of the digamma function, and the conjugate gradient method based on the fractional derivative is constructed to obtain the optimal estimation of the unknown order of the fractional derivative in the proposed time-fractional heat conduction model. Lastly, compared with the hyperthermia experimental data, it is observed that the calculated temperature increase values agree well with the measured temperature increase values in the experiment, which implies that the proposed time-fractional heat conduction model is effective in modeling the heat transfer in the hyperthermia experiment, and the proposed numerical technique to estimate the unknown fractional parameter is efficient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据