4.7 Article

Efficacy of mecillinam against clinical multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in a murine urinary tract infection model

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.11.008

关键词

Multidrug-resistant; ESBL; UTI model; In vivo; Carbapenemase; Mecillinam

资金

  1. Northern Norway Regional Health Authority [Helse-Nord HF] [SFP1051-12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pivmecillinam, a pro-drug of mecillinam, has been used extensively in Scandinavia for the treatment of acute lower urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by Enterobacterales. It is still an attractive first-line drug for the empirical treatment of UTIs owing to the low prevalence of resistance as well as its favourable impact on the intestinal microbiota as a pro-drug and good in vitro efficacy against extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)- and plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli. However, optimal dosing of pivmecillinam as well as its in vivo efficacy against UTIs caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) broad-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing E. coli has not been thoroughly studied. In this study, the efficacy of two mimicked human dosing regimens of pivmecillinam (200 mg and 400 mg three times daily) against clinical E. coli strains, including isolates producing ESBLs (CTX-M-14 and CTX-M-15), plasmid-mediated AmpCs (CMY-4 and CMY-6) and carbapenemases (NDM-1 and VIM-29), in a murine UTI model was compared. Both dosing regimens reduced the number of CFU/mL in urine for all strains, including mecillinam-resistant strains. Combining the effect for all six strains showed no significant differences in effect between doses for all three fluids/organs, but for each dose there was a highly significant effect in urine, kidney and bladder compared with vehicle-treated mice. Overall, this highlights the need for further studies to elucidate the role of mecillinam in the treatment of infections caused by MDR E. coli producing broad-spectrum beta-lactamases, including specific carbapenemases. (C) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据