4.6 Article

The silkworm (Bombyx mori) neuropeptide orcokinin is involved in the regulation of pigmentation

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2019.103229

关键词

Quail-like mutant; Orcokinin; Pigmentation; Neuropeptide; Bombyx mori

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31972616, 31672490, 31372378]
  2. open fund project of Key Laboratory of Silkworm and Mulberry Genetic Improvement, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs [KL201704]
  3. Graduate Student Innovation Program of Jiangsu province [KYCX17-1857, KYCX19_1656]
  4. Graduate Student Innovation Program of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology [YCX16B-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The natural colorful cuticles of insects play important roles in many physiological processes. Pigmentation is a physiological process with a complex regulatory network whose regulatory mechanism remains unclear. Bombyx mori pigmentation mutants are ideal materials for research on pigmentation mechanisms. The purple quail-like (q-l(p)) and brown quail-like (q-l(b)) mutants originated from plain silkworm breeds 932VR and 0223JH respectively exhibit similar cuticle pigmentation to that of the quail mutant. The q-l(p) mutant also presents a developmental abnormality. In this study, genes controlling q-l(p) and q-l(b) mutants were located on chromosome 8 by positional cloning. Then the neuropeptide gene orcokinin (OK) was identified to be the major gene responsible for two quail-like mutants. The B. mori orcokinin gene (BommoOK) produces two transcripts, BommoOKA and BommoOKB, by alternative splicing. The CRISPR/Cas9 system and orcokinin peptides injection were used for further functional verification. We show a novel function of BommoOKA in inhibiting pigmentation, and one mature peptide of orcokinin A, OKA_type2, is the key factor in pigmentation inhibition. These results provide a reference for studying the function of orcokinin and are of theoretical importance for studying the regulatory mechanism of pigmentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据