4.7 Article

Multiplicative data envelopment analysis cross-efficiency and stochastic weight space acceptability analysis for group decision making with interval multiplicative preference relations

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 514, 期 -, 页码 319-332

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.11.032

关键词

Group decision making; Multiplicative DEA cross-efficiency; Acceptability index; Assignment problem; Expected priority vector

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71501002, 61502003, 71871001, 71620107003]
  2. Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation [1608085QF133]
  3. Key research project of humanities and social sciences in colleges and universities of Anhui province [SK2019A0013, SK2018A0605]
  4. US Army Research Office [W911NF-15-1-0223]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To deal with group decision making (GDM) with interval multiplicative preference relations (IMPRs), this paper proposes a novel method based on multiplicative data envelopment analysis (DEA) cross-efficiency and stochastic weight space acceptability analysis. We first develop a multiplicative DEA model to evaluate the relative efficiency of all alternatives of a given multiplicative preference relation (MPR). Then, we present a method, free from consistency adjustment, to derive a priority vector using the multiplicative DEA cross-efficiency with respect to the given MPR. For GDM with IMPRs, we consider the decision makers' weights as a uniform distribution for acceptability analysis. A modified unacceptability index is further defined to measure the unlikeliness for a particular alternative in a particular rank. Finally, we develop an assignment problem model to achieve an optimal ranking by minimizing the total rank unacceptability, and to compute the expected priority vector of all alternatives. Numerical examples are provided to show the applicability and justifications of the proposed GDM method. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据