4.6 Article

Anthropogenic habitat alternation significantly decreases α- and β-diversity of benthopelagic metacommunity in a large floodplain lake

期刊

HYDROBIOLOGIA
卷 847, 期 1, 页码 293-307

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-019-04091-2

关键词

Local contribution to beta-diversity; Nestedness; Turnover; West Dongting Lake

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0405303]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017ZY15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anthropogenic habitat alternation is one of the leading causes of biodiversity loss, especially in freshwater ecosystems. Understanding the mechanisms of how habitat degradation drives changes in spatial patterns of species assemblages is fundamental to conservation science. We conducted an empirical study to investigate the species richness (alpha-diversity) and community composition (beta-diversity) of benthopelagic biota along the gradient of human modification in West Dongting Lake, China. The study site is a large floodplain lake that has been subjected to long-term intensive human use. For a better understanding of how beta-diversity responds to human disturbance, we also distinguished between two patterns of beta-diversity, i.e., turnover and nestedness. We found that both alpha- and beta-diversity of the benthopelagic assemblage decreased along the intensity gradient of human modification, indicating the strong homogenizing effect of anthropogenic habitat alternation. Our results also suggested that multiple processes, including environmental filtering, dispersal limitation, and biological interactions, were important in shaping the benthopelagic assemblage structure because spatial turnover other than nestedness dominated the total beta-diversity at both the lake and habitat level. These findings support that habitat restoration by removing artificial banks and channels and increasing the landscape naturalness would be the key for this highly modified floodplain lake.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据