4.6 Article

Investigation of the urea-water solution atomization process in engine exhaust-like conditions

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 75-84

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2019.05.019

关键词

Urea-water solution; Droplet size; Droplet velocity; Spray characteristics

资金

  1. IDIFEDER2018 from Generalitat Valenciana
  2. Universitat Politecnica de Valencia [FPI-2018-S2-13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The injection process of the urea-water solution (UWS) determines the initial conditions for the mixing and evaporation of the fluid in the selective catalytic reduction system. In this study, the liquid atomization process of a UWS dosing system is investigated using optical diagnosis through back-light imaging. The droplet diameter distribution and the droplet velocity (in the axial and tangential components) of the liquid spray are quantified under different air flow and injection conditions. A new test facility was designed to study UWS spray under conditions that resemble those of the engine exhaust pipe, which is capable of reaching an air flow of 400 kg/h and air temperatures up to 400 degrees C. The test matrix consisted of variations in the air flow temperature, air mass flow and UWS injection pressure. A high speed camera was used for capturing the images of the liquid spray, comparing the atomized liquid behaviour in three different regions of the plume: the first one near the nozzle exit, and the other two in the developed region of the spray (one aligned with the injector axis and the other at the spray periphery). Increasing the injection pressure affected the atomization process producing smaller particles with higher velocities in the axial and tangential components, promoting wider global spray angles, that combined with high air flow temperatures could improve the evaporation and mixing process in the SCR system. The main contribution is the development of an alternative technique for the quantification of the droplet size and velocity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据