4.4 Article

A standardized method for the construction of a tick drag/flag sampling approach and evaluation of sampling efficacy

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL AND APPLIED ACAROLOGY
卷 79, 期 3-4, 页码 433-446

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10493-019-00429-6

关键词

Acari; Fabric; Population assessment; Surveillance; Tick-borne disease

资金

  1. United States Department Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture 1890 Institution Teaching, Research and Extension Capacity Building Grants (CBG) Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drag sampling and flagging are two of the most effective and widely applied techniques to monitor tick populations. Despite the importance of this sampling strategy, there is a lack of standardized protocols for the construction of an inexpensive tick drag/flag. To this end, we provide a step-by-step protocol that details the construction of a tick drag/flag. We provide evidence of efficacy by comparing results obtained over 3-months at 108 locations within the William B. Bankhead National Forest, Alabama, USA. Overall, our drag/flag sampling approach yielded 1127 larvae, 460 nymphs, and 53 adults for a total of 1640 ticks representing three species. We detected significant patterns in Amblyomma americanum abundance for nymphs and adults with greater counts in June (beta = 0.91 +/- 0.36, 95% CI 0.55-1.27; beta = 2.44 +/- 0.63, 95% CI 1.81-3.07, respectively) and July (beta = 0.73 +/- 0.36, 95% CI 0.37-1.09; beta = 1.65 +/- 0.66, 95% CI 0.99-2.31, respectively) as compared to August. We also detected a significant difference in tick captures by tick drag/flag fabric type with greater captures when muslin was used as compared to flannel (beta = 1.07 +/- 0.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.13). Our goal is to provide instructions to assemble a highly effective tick drag/flag using minimal supplies. Evaluation and improvements of sampling techniques is essential to understand impacts of landscape management and larger stressors, such as climate change on tick populations but also for enhancing detection of invasive non-native species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据