4.7 Article

Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel benzodiazepine derivatives as anticancer agents through inhibition of tubulin polymerization in vitro and in vivo

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.111670

关键词

Tubulin polymerization inhibitors; Benzodiazepine derivatives; Antiproliferative activity; Cell cycle arrest; Apoptosis; In vivo antitumor activity

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2018A030313539]
  2. youth innovation project of Guangdong university [E1-KFD015181K35]
  3. Science Foundation of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine [2017KT1525]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of novel structurally-related tubulin polymerization inhibitors based on benzodiazepine were designed, synthesized, and evaluated for anticancer activity. Extensive structure modifications were performed to investigate the detailed structure and activity relationships (SARs). Most compounds exhibited potent antiproliferative activity against a panel of cancer cell lines. Among these compounds, the optimal compound, 9a, possessed the most superior activity, including cytotoxicity against five cancer cell lines (IC50 = 6-15 nM) and inhibition of tubulin polymerization (IC50= 1.65 +/- 0.11 mu M). Mechanistic studies revealed that 9a could disrupt intracellular microtubule organization, arrest cell cycle at the G(2)/M phase and eventually induce cell apoptosis. Compound 9a exhibited good metabolic stability with a t(1/2) of 161.2 min, which was much better than the reference compound CA-4. Moreover, the disodium salt of 9a, 9a-P, exhibited excellent in vivo antitumor activity in xenograft mice model with inhibitory rate of 893%, which was better than the reference compounds CA-4P (inhibitory rate: 52.8%) and Y-01P (inhibitory rate: 77.7%). Altogether, 9a could serve as a promising lead compound for the development of highly efficient anticancer agents. (C) 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据