4.7 Article

Consumers continue to be confused about electric vehicles: comparing awareness among Canadian new car buyers in 2013 and 2017

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 14, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab4ca1

关键词

electric vehicles; hybrid vehicles; consumer awareness; consumer research; survey

资金

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC)
  2. Natural Resources Canada
  3. Pacific Institute for Climate Solutions
  4. Community Trust Endowment Fund at Simon Fraser University
  5. BC Hydro
  6. Metro Vancouver
  7. City of Vancouver

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite policy support and technological progress, consumer adoption of electric vehicles remains limited globally. One important barrier to electric vehicle adoption may be limited consumer awareness. We investigate trends in consumer awareness, familiarity, and experience with electric vehicles by comparing cross-sectional survey responses from two representative samples of Canadian new vehicle-buyers collected in 2013 (n=2922) and in 2017 (n=1808). While a significantly higher proportion of 2017 respondents have ?heard of? key electric vehicle models, stated familiarity and experience are low for both samples. Further, about three-quarters of respondents in both samples are confused about the basic notion of how to refuel (or recharge) electric vehicles?and how these vehicles differ from hybrids. Conversely, over half of 2017 respondents report having seen at least one electric vehicle charger in public, which is more than double the proportion reported in the 2013 sample. These trends hold in analyses of three Canadian provinces, including two that have engaged in significant consumer outreach activities over this time frame. Overall, in contrast to expectations, our results suggest that consumer awareness remains low and stagnant, which may hinder market growth and inhibit the climate mitigation potential of electric vehicles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据