4.7 Article

A model-based state-of-charge estimation method for series- connected lithium-ion battery pack considering fast-varying cell temperature

期刊

ENERGY
卷 185, 期 -, 页码 847-861

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.063

关键词

Lithium-ion battery; Inconsistency; Model-based; State-of-charge; Fast-varying temperature

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51677119]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurately estimating the state-of-charge (SOC) of lithium-ion batteries under complicated temperature conditions is crucial in all-climate battery management systems. This paper proposes a model-based SOC estimation method for series-connected battery pack with time-varying cell temperature. Systematic battery experiments are conducted to investigate the influences of changing temperature on both cell characteristics and cell-to-cell inconsistencies. A normalized open-circuit voltage (OCV) model is developed and applied in cell Thevenin model to describe the temperature-dependent OCV-SOC characteristic. The battery pack SOC is analyzed considering the effect of passive balance control. Then, a lumped parameter battery pack model is established by connecting cell models in series. To reduce computational complexity, a dual time-scale parameter identification framework is proposed which is supported by an online filtering process of selecting variable reference cell (VRC). An adaptive coestimator is presented to update pack parameters in dual time-scale using an optimized recursive least squares algorithm, and to estimate the battery pack SOC using an extended Kalman filter. Experimental verifications are conducted under time-varying environmental temperature ranging from -40 degrees C to 40 degrees C. Results indicate the established model can well describe the dynamic behavior of battery pack, and the proposed method can estimate the battery pack SOC with considerably high precision. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据