4.7 Article

Network embedding for link prediction: The pitfall and improvement

期刊

CHAOS
卷 29, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.5120724

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) [61603073, 61773091]
  2. Key Research and Development Plan of Liaoning Province [2018104016]
  3. LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC1807106]
  4. Program for the Outstanding Innovative Talents ofHigher Learning Institutions of Liaoning [LR2016070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Link prediction plays a significant role in various applications of complex networks. The existing link prediction methods can be divided into two categories: structural similarity algorithms in network domain and network embedding algorithms in the field of machine learning. However, few researchers focus on comparing these two categories of algorithms and exploring the intrinsic relationship between them. In this study, we systematically compare the two categories of algorithms and study the shortcomings of network embedding algorithms. The results indicate that network embedding algorithms have poor performance in short-path networks. Then, we explain the reasons for this phenomenon by computing the Euclidean distance distribution of node pairs after a given network has been embedded into a vector space. In the vector space of a short-path network, the distance distribution of existent and nonexistent links are often less distinguishable, which can sharply reduce the algorithmic performance. In contrast, structural similarity algorithms, which are not restricted by the distance function, can represent node similarity accurately in short-path networks. To address the above pitfall of network embedding, we propose a novel method for link prediction aiming to supplement network embedding algorithms with local structural information. The experimental results suggest that our proposed algorithm has significant performance improvement in many empirical networks, especially in short-path networks. AUC and Precision can be improved by 36.7%-94.4% and 53.2%-207.2%, respectively. Published under license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据