4.8 Article

Spontaneous Crystallization of Perovskite Nanocrystals in Nonpolar Organic Solvents: A Versatile Approach for their Shape-Controlled Synthesis

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 58, 期 46, 页码 16558-16562

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201906862

关键词

FAPbX(3) nanocubes; FAPbX(3) nanoplatelets; ligand-assisted reprecipitation; perovskite nanocrystals; spontaneous crystallization

资金

  1. European Union [839042, 754388]
  2. Bavarian State Ministry of Science, Research, and Arts through the grant Solar Technologies go Hybrid (SolTech)
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [EXC 2089/1-390776260]
  4. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  5. Croucher Senior Fellowship
  6. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong
  7. German Academic Exchange Service of Germany [G-CityU106/18]
  8. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [839042] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The growing demand for perovskite nanocrystals (NCs) for various applications has stimulated the development of facile synthetic methods. Perovskite NCs have often been synthesized by either ligand-assisted reprecipitation (LARP) at room temperature or by hot-injection at high temperatures and inert atmosphere. However, the use of polar solvents in LARP affects their stability. Herein, we report on the spontaneous crystallization of perovskite NCs in nonpolar organic media at ambient conditions by simple mixing of precursor-ligand complexes without application of any external stimuli. The shape of the NCs can be controlled from nanocubes to nanoplatelets by varying the ratio of monovalent (e.g. formamidinium(+) (FA(+)) and Cs+) to divalent (Pb2+) cation-ligand complexes. The precursor-ligand complexes are stable for months, and thus perovskite NCs can be readily prepared prior to use. Moreover, we show that this versatile synthetic process is scalable and generally applicable for perovskite NCs of different compositions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据