4.8 Article

Sheathless Acoustic Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (aFACS) with High Cell Viability

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 91, 期 24, 页码 15425-15435

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b03021

关键词

-

资金

  1. Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 2 [T2M0E1603]
  2. Singapore -MIT Alliance for Research and Technology innovation grant [SMIG17002]
  3. Singapore Ministry of Health's National Medical Research Council under its Open Fund-Young Individual Research Grant (OF-YIRG) [NMRC/OFYIRG/0073/2018]
  4. National Health Innovation Centre Singapore under its Innovation to Develop Grant [NHIC-I2S-1811007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we demonstrate a sheathless acoustic fluorescence activated cell sorting (aFACS) system by combining elasto-inertial cell focusing and highly focused traveling surface acoustic wave (FTSAW) to sort cells with high recovery rate, purity, and cell viability. The microfluidic sorting device utilizes elasto-inertial particle focusing to align cells in a single file for improving sorting accuracy and efficiency without sample dilution. Our sorting device can effectively focus 1 mu m particles which represents the general minimum size for a majority of cell sorting applications. Upon the fluorescence interrogation at the single cell level, individual cells are deflected to the target outlet by similar to 50 mu m wide highly focused acoustic field. We have applied our aFACS to sort three different cell lines (i.e., MCF-7, MDA-231, and human-induced pluripotent stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes; hiPSC-CMs) at similar to kHz with a sorting purity and recovery rate both of about 90%. A further comparison demonstrates that the cell viability drops by 35-45% using a commercial FACS machine, while the cell viability only drops by 3-4% using our aFACS system. The developed aFACS system provides a benchtop solution for rapid, highly accurate single cell level sorting with high cell viability, in particular for sensitive cell types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据