4.7 Article

Characterisation of promising phase change materials for high temperature thermal energy storage

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 24, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2019.100801

关键词

Phase change materials; Thermal energy storage; High temperature; Thermophysical property; Thermal stability

资金

  1. Australian Government, through the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the current study two phase change materials have been initially characterised as potential high temperature phase change materials (PCM) for thermal energy storage. Thermophysical properties such as melting/freezing point, latent heat, and specific heat capacity were determined using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Results from the uncycled PCMs show a melting point of 541.98 +/- 0.15 degrees C and a latent heat of 164.96 +/- 3.83 J/g for the lower temperature PCM (BaCl2-KCl-NaCl), and 706.92 +/- 0.34 degrees C and 133.14 +/- 3.55 J/g for the higher temperature PCM (K2CO3-Na2CO3). This largely compares well with the melting points and latent heats provided in literature. Theoretical predictions of other properties such as solid and liquid density, liquid thermal conductivity, and viscosity were also estimated. Lastly, samples of the PCM were also cycled up to 200 times with the melting point and latent heat measured. From the cycling results, the melting point and latent heat of samples cycled 200 times show almost no change. The measured melting point and latent heat after 200 cycles was found to be 541.30 +/- 0.16 degrees C and 161.64 +/- 2.60 J/g, respectively, for the low temperature PCM. Similarly, the higher temperature PCM showed good cycling stability after 200 cycles with a melting point and latent heat of 704.62 +/- 0.29 degrees C and 135.42 +/- 3.59 J/g, respectively. Overall, it was found that the PCMs investigated in the current study show promising results to be considered as high temperature energy storage materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据