4.6 Article

Mechanically Strong Shape-Memory and Solvent-Resistant Double Network Polyurethane/Nanoporous Cellulose Gel Nanocomposites

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 7, 期 19, 页码 15974-15982

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02341

关键词

Nanoporous cellulose gel; Polyurethane; Nanocomposites; Reinforcement; Percolation model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21875170, 51373125, 21422405]
  2. Wuhan Morning Light Plan of Youth Science and Technology [2017050304010312]
  3. Special Fund for the Development of Strategic Emerging Industries of Shenzhen City of China [JCYJ20180507184711069, JCYJ20170818112409808]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2042017kf0195, 2042015kf0259]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the design and fabrication of double-network polyurethane (PU)/nanoporous cellulose gel (NCG) nanocomposites with excellent mechanical properties, multistimuli-responsive shape-memory effects, and solvent resistance using NCG as a 3D reinforcement nanofiller for the PU network. The interconnected nanofibrillar cellulose networks of the NCG are finely distributed and preserved well in the PU network after polymerization. The modified percolation model agrees well with the mechanical properties of the PU/NCG nanocomposites. The remarkable reinforcement effect on the PU network is most probably due to the incorporation of the permanent, rigid, three-dimensional percolating network of the NCG that successfully transfers mechanical stresses through the covalent cross-linking, hydrogen bonds, and chain entanglements between the NCG and PU networks. The PU/NCG nanocomposites have excellent shape-memory properties with good thermal- and water-stimuli responsiveness, good dimensional stability, excellent solvent resistance, and outstanding mechanical properties in organic solvents, and they have considerable potential applications in switchable devices, sensors, biomaterials, and many other fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据