4.7 Article

Structure from Motion Point Clouds for Structural Monitoring

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 11, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs11161940

关键词

structural health monitoring; structure from motion; terrestrial laser scanner; close-range photogrammetry; point clouds modeling

资金

  1. research grant for the project Healthy Cities and Smart Territories (2016/17) - Fondazione di Sardegna
  2. Autonomous Region of Sardinia under grant P. O. R. SARDEGNA 2014-2020 [CCI: 2014-IT05SFOP021]
  3. Autonomous Region of Sardinia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dense point clouds acquired from Terrestrial Laser Scanners (TLS) have proved to be effective for structural deformation assessment. In the last decade, many researchers have defined methodology and workflow in order to compare different point clouds, with respect to each other or to a known model, assessing the potentialities and limits of this technique. Currently, dense point clouds can be obtained by Close-Range Photogrammetry (CRP) based on a Structure from Motion (SfM) algorithm. This work reports on a comparison between the TLS technique and the Close-Range Photogrammetry using the Structure from Motion algorithm. The analysis of two Reinforced Concrete (RC) beams tested under four-points bending loading is presented. In order to measure displacement distributions, point clouds at different beam loading states were acquired and compared. A description of the instrumentation used and the experimental environment, along with a comprehensive report on the calculations and results obtained is reported. Two kinds of point clouds comparison were investigated: Mesh to mesh and modeling with geometric primitives. The comparison between the mesh to mesh (m2m) approach and the modeling (m) one showed that the latter leads to significantly better results for both TLS and CRP. The results obtained with the TLS for both m2m and m methodologies present a Root Mean Square (RMS) levels below 1 mm, while the CRP method yields to an RMS level of a few millimeters for m2m, and of 1 mm for m.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据