4.2 Article

HOXA11-AS promotes the migration and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by inhibiting miR-124 expression by binding to EZH2

期刊

HUMAN CELL
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 504-514

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s13577-019-00269-x

关键词

HCC; HOXA11-AS; miR-124; EZH2; Invasion; Migration

资金

  1. Science and Technology Development Project of JiLin Province [20180101124JC]
  2. Special Project for Health Research of JiLin Province [2018SCZ031]
  3. Health Technology Innovation Project of JiLin Province [3D517ED43430]
  4. Norman Bethune Program of JiLin University [2012201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study was to examine the function of the long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) HOXA11-AS in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In total, samples from liver tumor and surrounding normal liver tissues were collected from 66 cases of HCC patients. Normal liver cell line HL-7702 and HCC cell lines HepG2, Hep3B, MHCC-97H and BEL7402 were used. Cells were transfected with different small interference RNAs or vectors. Then, transwell assay, qRT-PCR, CHIP, RIP and Western blot experiments were performed. We found that the HOXA11-AS expression level was higher in HCC samples than surrounding normal liver tissues. And the higher expression level of HOXA11-AS in HCC patients indicated a lower 5-year survival rate. Knockdown of HOXA11-AS in HepG2 and Hep3B cells caused impaired cell invasion and migration abilities. Otherwise, upregulation of HOXA11-AS in MHCC-97H and BEL7402 cells displayed higher invasion and migration capabilities. We also demonstrated that HOXA11-AS could inhibit miR-124 expression by binding to EZH2. Furthermore, overexpression of miR-124 or knockdown EZH2 expression could reverse the HOXA11-AS-induced migration and invasion effects in HCC cells. In summary, the high HOXA11-AS expression in HCC patients is associated with the poor outcome. HOXA11-AS could inhibit miR-124 expression by binding to EZH2 and thus promoted the migration and invasion of HCC cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据