4.7 Article

Spatial and temporal variation of Marek's disease virus and infectious laryngotracheitis virus genome in dust samples following live vaccination of layer flocks

期刊

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY
卷 236, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2019.108393

关键词

Aggregated samples; Infectious laryngotracheitis virus; Marek's disease virus; Population monitoring; Poultry dust; PCR; Vaccine

资金

  1. PoultryHub Australia [2017-20, 18-424]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monitoring of Marek's disease virus (MDV) and infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV) genome using poultry dust can be useful to monitor on-farm vaccination protocols but there are no set guidelines for collection of this sample type. This study assessed different dust collection methods for MDV and ILTV detection in a vaccinated layer flock (n = 1700) from day-old to 50 weeks of age. Birds were vaccinated against MDV at day-old, and ILTV by drinking water at week 6 and eye drop at week 12. Dust samples were collected weekly by settle plates (1-3 plates/15 m(2)) or by scraping surfaces in the poultry shed and tested for ILTV and MDV genomic copies (GC) by PCR. ILTV GC were detected 4 weeks post water vaccination, peaked at weeks 12-14 and became mostly undetectable after week 18. MDV was detected in dust on week 1, peaked at weeks 3-6, declined 3 logs by week 26 and remained detectable at this level until week 50. There was no difference in the detection rates of ILTV and MDV collected from settle plates in different locations of the shed (P > 0.10). There was no difference between settle plate and scraped samples in ILTV GC load but higher MDV GC were found in scraped samples. The settle plate method appears to reflect the current level of vaccine virus in the flock while the scrape method likely represents a cumulative record of shedding. Assessment of viral GC in dust samples is a good candidate for a practical method of estimating successful vaccine administration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据