4.7 Article

Highly sensitive electrochemical detection of Pb(II) based on excellent adsorption and surface Ni(II)/Ni(III) cycle of porous flower-like NiO/rGO nanocomposite

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 292, 期 -, 页码 136-147

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.04.131

关键词

NiO/rGO nanocomposite; Pb(II); Highly sensitive; Excellent adsorption; Surface Ni(II)/Ni(III) cycle

资金

  1. postdoctoral innovation talents supporting project [BX20180311]
  2. national natural science foundation of China [21735005]
  3. technology major project of Anhui Province [17030801033]
  4. natural science foundation of Anhui Province [1708085MB36]
  5. postdoctoral researcher funding project of Anhui Province [2018B244]
  6. CASHIPS Director's Fund [YZJJ201701]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, combining the good catalysis of NiO with high adsorption and conductivity of reduced graphene oxide (rGO), the electrochemical sensing interface was constructed using the porous flower-like NiO/rGO nanocomposite modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE). The result of Pb(II) detection was obtained with high sensitivity of 92.81 mu M mu A(-1) and low detection limit of 0.01 mu M by square wave anodic stripping voltammetry (SWASV). The reasonable sensitive mechanism for enhancing electrochemical performance is that the excellent adsorption capacity and Ni(II)/Ni(III) cycle on surface of NiO/rGO nanocomposite could improve the electrochemical detection signal. Furthermore, the proposed method achieved the high anti-interference on the determination of Pb(II) in the co-existence of Cd(II), Cu(II), Hg(II). The excellent stability and reproducibility were also confirmed by repeatedly test. In addition, the concentration of Pb(II) in real water samples from Taochong wastewater treatment plant in Hefei city were analyzed and calculated accurately. These results indicates that the NiO/rGO nanocomposite as a promising electrode modifier could be potentially applied in electrochemical sensor for detecting Pb(II).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据