4.7 Article

A numerical study on the interaction between forward and aft propellers of hybrid CRP pod propulsion systems

期刊

OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.05.066

关键词

Hybrid CRP pod propulsion system (CRP-POD); Interaction between forward and aft propellers; Improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES); Vortical structure; Energy-saving device (ESD)

资金

  1. research project High Technology Ship Scientific Research Project by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of China [MIIT [2014] 507]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a numerical study on the interaction between the forward and aft propellers of hybrid CRP pod propulsion systems (CRP-POD) in open water with a focus on both global quantities, that is, thrust and torque, and flow details, such as vortical structure, slipstream evolution, and lateral load on the pod unit. Improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) method is adopted and combined with the gamma - Re-theta transition model. The open-water characteristics of CRP-POD obtained by CFD are in satisfactory agreement with model test data. Two sets of CRP-PODs with different propeller geometries are considered. It is found independently of propeller geometry that (i) in terms of thrust and torque, the forward propeller is slightly affected by the aft propeller, while it has a large effect on the aft propeller; (ii) the wake of the forward propeller is accelerated in the axial direction and weakened in the tangential direction by the aft propeller; and (iii) the time-averaged lateral force on the pod unit is reduced remarkably by the propeller-propeller interaction. However, the vortex interaction between the forward and aft propellers depends significantly on the propeller geometry. In the case when the tip vortices shed by the forward and aft propellers can directly collide with each other, the vortical structure in the wake becomes unstable and rapidly breaks down.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据