4.4 Article

MicroRNA expression profiles of neuron-derived extracellular vesicles in plasma from patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
卷 708, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.03.048

关键词

Bioinformatics; MicroRNA; ALS; Extracellular vesicles

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [JP17ek0109110, JP16ek0109048]
  2. Research Committee of the Ataxia
  3. Research Committee of CNS Degenerative Diseases, Research on Policy Planning and Evaluation for Rare and Intractable Diseases, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
  4. Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) in peripheral blood have been extensively investigated as biomarkers for early diagnosis and monitoring of disease progression. However, their cellular origin as well as their link to the pathophysiology, especially neurodegenerative disease, remains largely unknown. In the present study, we isolated neuron-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) in plasma by immunoaffinity purification and comprehensively analyzed their miRNA expression profiles using microarray. A total of 30 miRNAs were differentially regulated in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) plasma relative to healthy control plasma. Gene ontology analysis revealed that biological processes implicated in both up-regulated and down-regulated miRNAs were involved in synaptic vesicle-related pathways. Especially, 4 miRNAs in plasma neuro-derived EVs seemed to be regulated in the similar manner as those in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded motor cortex samples from ALS patients. The target genes for the 4 miRNAs partly overlapped in STX1B, RAB3B, and UNC13A genes. UNC13A has been reported to be associated with increased odds of sporadic ALS in multiple genome-wide association studies. Our data suggest that miRNAs extracted from neuron-derived EVs in plasma reflect miRNA alterations in the brain as potential biomarkers of ALS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据