4.7 Article

Serum neurofilament light chain in pediatric MS and other acquired demyelinating syndromes

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 93, 期 10, 页码 E968-E974

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008057

关键词

-

资金

  1. Dutch MS Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To explore the correlation between serum and CSF neurofilament light chain (NfL) and the association of NfL levels and future disease activity in pediatric patients with a first attack of acquired demyelinating syndromes (ADS). Methods In total, 102 children <18 years with a first attack of CNS demyelination and 23 age-matched controls were included. Clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS) was set as an endpoint for analysis. CSF NfL was tested by the commercially available ELISA (UmanDiagnostics); serum NfL (sNfL) was tested with a Simoa assay. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated with Cox regression analysis. Results Of the 102 patients, 47 (46%) were tested for CSF NfL. CSF and serum NfL correlated significantly in the total group (rho 0.532, p < 0.001) and even more significantly in the subgroup of patients with future CDMS diagnosis (rho 0.773, p < 0.001). sNfL was higher in patients than in controls (geometric mean 6.1 pg/mL, p < 0.001), and was highest in ADS presenting with encephalopathy (acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, n = 28, 100.4 pg/mL), followed by patients without encephalopathy (ADS-) with future CDMS diagnosis (n = 40, 32.5 pg/mL), and ADS- who remained monophasic (n = 34, 17.6 pg/mL). sNfL levels higher than a median of 26.7 pg/mL at baseline are associated with a shorter time to CDMS diagnosis in ADS-(p = 0.045). HR for CDMS diagnosis was 1.09 for each 10 pg/mL increase of sNfL, after correction for age, oligoclonal bands, and MRI measures (p = 0.012). Conclusion The significant correlation between CSF and serum NfL strengthens its reliability as a peripheral marker of neuroaxonal damage. Higher sNfL levels at baseline were associated with higher probability of future CDMS diagnosis in ADS-.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据