4.7 Article

N-glycopeptide Signatures of IgA2 in Serum from Patients with Hepatitis B Virus-related Liver Diseases

期刊

MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
卷 18, 期 11, 页码 2262-2272

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.RA119.001722

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0501303]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project of China [2018ZX10302205-003]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21505022, 81522036, 31700727]
  4. Zhongshan Hospital [2017ZSGG08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

N-glycosylation alteration has been reported in liver diseases. Characterizing N-glycopeptides that correspond to N-glycan structure with specific site information enables better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of liver damage and cancer. Here, unbiased quantification of N-glycopeptides of a cluster of serum glycoproteins with 40-55 kDa molecular weight (40-kDa band) was investigated in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver diseases. We used an N-glycopeptide method based on O-18/O-16 C-terminal labeling to obtain 82 comparisons of serum from patients with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver cirrhosis (LC). Then, multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) was performed to quantify N-glycopeptide relative to the protein content, especially in the healthy donor-HBV-LC-HCC cascade. TPLTAN(205)ITK (H5N5S1F1) and (H5N4S2F1) corresponding to the glycopeptides of IgA(2) were significantly elevated in serum from patients with HBV infection and even higher in HBV-related LC patients, as compared with healthy donor. In contrast, the two glycopeptides of IgA(2) fell back down in HBV-related HCC patients. In addition, the variation in the abundance of two glycopeptides was not caused by its protein concentration. The altered N-glycopeptides might be part of a unique glycan signature indicating an IgA-mediated mechanism and providing potential diagnostic clues in HBV-related liver diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据