4.7 Article

Stator current model for detecting rolling bearing faults in induction motors using magnetic equivalent circuits

期刊

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 554-575

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.06.010

关键词

Stator current model; Induction motor; Rolling bearing; Localised defect; Magnetic equivalent circuit; Air gap length

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [11872222]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [3194051]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Tribology [SKLT2019B09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stator current modeling for defective induction motor rolling bearings (IMRBs) based on magnetic equivalent circuits (MEC) is carried out. A dynamic model of rotor system supported by defective IMRBs is established to numerically obtain the non-uniform time-varying air gap length. MEC modeling of a induction motor (IM) is then conducted and a magnetic equivalent network is formed by connecting the flux tubes with nodes. After considering the nonlinear air gap permeance, nonlinear iron material and magnetic saturation, an iterative numerical integration method is proposed to solve the stator current model. Finite element analysis and dynamic tests on a typical IM are carried out for verification. Based on these, the fault characteristic frequencies in stator current spectra are, respectively, identified for outer race spall, inner race spall and ball spall. Fault-related frequencies are basically represented by the combinations between the passing frequency (outer race, inner race or ball), its harmonics and power supply frequency. Due to the modulation of rotor (or cage) rotation, higher harmonics of rotor frequency (or cage frequency) participate in the fault-related frequencies of the inner race (or ball) spall. Some fault-related frequencies, which might be more suitable for condition monitoring of induction motors, are recommended by comparing the slope of each spectral amplitude varying with spall width. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据