4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

A robust control of a 4-leg floating interleaved boost converter for fuel cell electric vehicle application

期刊

MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION
卷 167, 期 -, 页码 32-47

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2019.09.014

关键词

DC/DC converter; Fuel cell; Floating interleaved boost converter; Robust control; Mixed sensitivity H infinity controller

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the Operational Programme for Competitiveness and Internationalization (COMPETE 2020) [POCI-01-0145-FEDER 029494]
  2. FCT -Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [PTDC/EEI-EEE/29494/2017, UID/EEA/004131/2013, UID/EEA/004131/2016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a real time validation of a robust control strategy applied to a non-isolated DC/DC power converter with a high step-up ratio, that is suitable for fuel-cell electric vehicle applications. The controlled converter in this work is a four phases floating interleaved boost converter (FIBC) that is selected to achieve a high output voltage, improved efficiency, a reduced input current-output voltage undulation. The proposed controller scheme is designed thanks to a dual loop control based on S/KS mixed Sensitivity H infinity approach that consists of an external voltage loop and an inner current loop to attain a fast regulation versus the disturbance and load variation with a high dynamic performance and robustness even in failure mode. The effectiveness and robustness of the proposed control have been tested firstly by the simulation using Matlab-Simulink software then have been validated through experimental results conducted on 1.2-kW laboratory prototype piloted via dSPACE-1104 single card under different scenarios: load variation, steady-transient responses and Open-Circuit power switch failure mode. (C) 2019 International Association for Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (IMACS). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据