4.5 Article

Ab Initio Investigation of the Resonance Raman Spectrum of the Hydrated Electron

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 123, 期 38, 页码 8074-8085

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b04895

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1665322, 106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

According to the conventional picture, the aqueous or hydrated electron, e(-)(aq), occupies an excluded volume (cavity) in the structure of liquid water. However, simulations with certain one-electron models predict a more delocalized spin density for the unpaired electron, with no distinct cavity structure. It has been suggested that only the latter (non-cavity) structure can explain the hydrated electron's resonance Raman spectrum, although this suggestion is based on calculations using empirical frequency maps developed for neat liquid water, not for e(-)(aq). All-electron ab initio calculations presented here demonstrate that both cavity and non-cavity models of e(-)(aq) afford significant red-shifts in the O-H stretching region. This effect is nonspecific and arises due to electron penetration into frontier orbitals of the water molecules. Only the conventional cavity model, however, reproduces the splitting of the H-O-D bend (in isotopically mixed water) that is observed experimentally and arises due to the asymmetric environments of the hydroxyl moieties in the electron's first solvation shell. We conclude that the cavity model of e(-)(aq) is more consistent with the measured resonance Raman spectrum than is the delocalized, non-cavity model, despite previous suggestions to the contrary. Furthermore, calculations with hybrid density functionals and with Hartree-Fock theory predict that non-cavity liquid geometries afford only unbound (continuum) states for an extra electron, whereas in reality this energy level should lie more than 3 eV below vacuum level. As such, the non-cavity model of e(-)(aq) appears to be inconsistent with available vibrational spectroscopy, photoelectron spectroscopy, and quantum chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据