4.2 Article

Tracking fishing ground parameters in cloudy region using ocean colour and satellite-derived surface flow estimates: A study in the Bay of Bengal

期刊

JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 59-70

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1755876X.2019.1658566

关键词

PFZ; oceanic eddy; thermal front; chlorophyll concentration; upfront; downfront winds

资金

  1. Space Applications Centre
  2. Earth, Ocean, Atmosphere, Planetary Sciences and Applications Area
  3. AOSG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new conceptual framework based on satellite observations has been proposed to track fishing ground parameters and identify Potential Fishing Zones (PFZ) in the Bay of Bengal. The study has shown promise in improved monitoring of potential fish catch locations through comparison with in situ fish catch data.
A new conceptual framework, based on ocean bio-physical observations from different satellites, has been proposed to track fishing ground parameters to identify Potential Fishing Zones (PFZ) in the Bay of Bengal (BoB). The proposed technique also attempts to provide a short-term forecast based on feature propagation, even under cloudy conditions. The current study has been carried out to understand the link between possible fish catch availability and satellite-derived parameters such as chlorophyll concentration, sea surface temperature, sea-level anomaly, ocean surface currents and wind vectors. Net Ekman transport obtained from the upfront and downfront components of the wind relative to the frontal direction provides valuable information on the forecast of PFZ regions and its possible shift. Comparison of the identified PFZs with limited in situ fish catch data proves that the suggested approach holds the promise in improved monitoring of possible fish catch locations. The study provides a novel approach for the monitoring and short-term forecasting of PFZ even for cloud-contaminated regions by using all possible ocean information from space-based platforms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据