4.6 Article

Study on material removal mechanism of electrochemical deep grinding

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 271, 期 -, 页码 510-519

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.04.033

关键词

Electrochemical deep grinding; Material removal mechanism; Superalloy; Hybrid machining; Electrochemical grinding

资金

  1. State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [51535006]
  2. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Precision and Micro-Manufacturing Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deep grinding, such as creep-feed grinding and high efficiency deep grinding, offers the possibility of high process efficiency. However, deep grinding is also suffering from grinding heat and grinding wheel wear, resulting in serious surface damage and precision error. Hybrid machining process is generally regarded as effective way to improve the machining performances. Electrochemical machining (ECM) is an anodic electrochemical dissolution process that can effectively remove materials without limitations in terms of the mechanical properties of the alloys. Therefore, this paper attempts to combine deep grinding with ECM process, which can be named electrochemical deep grinding (ECDG). During ECDG process, mechanical grinding and ECM process are simultaneously applied on the anode workpiece. With the aid of high-speed ECM process, the cut-depth is greatly increased without damaging the workpiece. The feed rate and machining stability are also further improved by scraping the electrolyte product and insoluble components. The removal mechanism of anode material during ECDG process was studied through experiments in detail. Based the detailed analysis of material removal phenomenon, a qualitative model of material removal mechanism of ECDG was established. This research provides valuable insights into the material removal mechanism and the dependence of MRR and surface quality on machining conditions in the hybrid process of ECM and deep grinding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据