4.4 Article

Renal Papillary Mapping and Quantification of Randall's Plaque in Pediatric Calcium Oxalate Stone Formers

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
卷 33, 期 10, 页码 863-867

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0377

关键词

pediatrics; urolithiasis; Randall's plaque; ureteroscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Randall's plaque (RP) with attached stones is recognized as a primary mechanism for stone formation in adult calcium oxalate stone formers (CaOx SFs). The role of RP in pediatric stone pathogenesis is unknown, with no reported studies to date. The purpose of this study is to investigate renal papillary abnormalities and quantify RP in pediatric CaOx SFs. Methods: Eight pediatric CaOx SFs underwent ureteroscopy for symptomatic urolithiasis. The collecting system was mapped using a digital ureteroscope. Video for each patient was then reviewed using a retrograde pyelogram to confirm the location of each papilla. A single investigator (N.L.M.) reviewed the video to quantify RP. Each papilla was graded as having mild, moderate, or severe amount of RP. Patient history was recorded. Results: An average of nine papillae were mapped per patient. RP was present in 100% of patients and in 88.8% (64/72) of all papillae examined. When present, RP was uniformly distributed throughout the kidney without preferential distribution to a region or pole. The amount of RP on the papillae was graded as mild in 60%, moderate in 20.8%, and severe in 8.3%. The mean fractional RP coverage ranged from 0.39% to 9.34%. No correlation was found between the amount of plaque and age at first stone episode or number of prior stone episodes (p = 0.84). Attached stones were rare (1/8 patients). The two patients with severe RP had a small amount of calcium phosphate in their stone analysis. Conclusions: RP is common in pediatric CaOx SFs. Compared with adult CaOx SFs wherein up to 75% of stones are found attached to RP, attached stones were rare. The significance of these findings in the pathogenesis of pediatric stone formation remains unclear and will require longer term follow-up.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据