4.7 Article

A microbiological inhibition method for the rapid, broad-spectrum, and high-throughput screening of 34 antibiotic residues in milk

期刊

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
卷 102, 期 12, 页码 10825-10837

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-16480

关键词

antibiotic residue; microbiological inhibition method; Geobacillus stearothermophilus ATCC12980; milk

资金

  1. 2019 National Risk Assessment of Quality and Safety of Agricultural Product [GJFP2019027]
  2. Key Project of the Ministry of Agriculture (Beijing, China) [2011-G5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we developed a microbiological inhibition method for the rapid screening of antibiotics in milk with Geobacillus stearothermophilus ATCC12980 as an indicator bacterium and an easy sample pretreatment. We observed that the limits of detection of the kit for 34 common antibiotic residues in milk, including beta-lactams (13), a in noglycosides (6), tetracyclines (4), sulfonamides (6), macrolides (4), lincosamides (1), were lower than or close to the maximum residue limits formulated by the European Union and China. Moreover, the false-positive rate was 1% and the falsenegative rates were less than 5%. The ruggedness of the method (the reproducibility of detection capability of different batches of medium) met requirements at determined levels and residual limits. The shelf life of the kit was more than 6 mo at 4 degrees C. Additionally, we observed good correlations between the kit results and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry results for incurred milk (samples taken from animals treated with antibiotics according to the pre-slaughter medication data), which indicated that the kit was reliable for screening antibiotics in incurred samples. In conclusion, the kit has a broad application potential with high sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility, stability, and reliability, combined with simple operation, low cost, and high-throughput capacity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据