4.7 Article

Blank roasting and bioleaching of stone coal for vanadium recycling

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 243, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118625

关键词

Stone coal; Vanadium; Bioleaching; Compound mutagenesis; Blank roasting

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51874018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recovery and utilization of vanadium from stone coal is of great significance because it is an important metal. In the present study, a cleaner metal extraction method to recover vanadium from low-grade stone coal using a novel strain of Bacillus mucilaginosus (BM) and an enhanced bioleaching procedure was explored. The efficient leaching bacteria of BM-5070 were obtained by the atmospheric and room temperature plasma (ARTP)-hydroxylamine hydrochloride compound mutagenesis technique. The results show that BM-5070 had the highest V leaching rate. After a 20-day bioleaching period, the V leaching rate of BM-5070 was 5.5 percentage points higher than that of the original bacteria. Moreover, the pretreatment of stone coal by blank roasting without any additives can further promote the vanadium dissolution, and the V leaching rate reached 85% after bioleaching for 20 days, which was 57 percentage points higher than that of without roasting. This is due to the decrease in the content of V (III) and the increase in the V (V) and V (IV) content after blank roasting, which is beneficial to the leaching of vanadium. The bioleaching behavior was elucidated through the bacteria-mineral contact leaching and non-contact leaching test. The results show that the V leaching rate (81.0%) in the contact mode was much higher than that in the non-contact leaching mode (64.4%), indicating that the bioleaching of vanadium occurs with direct action and indirect action. The results of our study could significantly contribute to a green method for recovering vanadium from stone coal. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据