4.7 Article

Signaling pathways in cytoskeletal responses to plasma membrane depolarization in corneal endothelial cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 235, 期 3, 页码 2947-2962

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.29200

关键词

actin cytoskeleton; cAMP; PKA; corneal endothelium; myosin light chain; plasma membrane depolarization

资金

  1. Agencia Nacional de Investigacion e Innovacion (ANII), Uruguay [PR_FCE_2009_1_2474]
  2. Comision Sectorial de Investigacion Cientifica (CSIC), Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay
  3. Programa de Desarrollo de las Ciencias Basicas (PEDECIBA), Uruguay

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In previous work, we reported that plasma membrane potential depolarization (PMPD) provokes cortical F-actin remodeling in bovine corneal endothelial (BCE) cells in culture, which eventually leads to the appearance of intercellular gaps. In kidney epithelial cells it has been shown that PMPD determines an extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/Rho-dependent increase in diphosphorylated myosin light chain (ppMLC). The present study investigated the signaling pathways involved in the response of BCE cells to PMPD. Differently to renal epithelial cells, we observed that PMPD leads to a decrease in monophosphorylated MLC (pMLC) without affecting diphosphorylated MLC. Also, that the pMLC reduction is a consequence of cyclic adenosine 3 ',5 '-monophosphate (cAMP)/protein kinase A (PKA) activation. In addition, we found evidence that the cAMP increase mostly depends on soluble adenylyl cyclase activity. Inhibition of this enzyme reduces the effect of PMPD on the cAMP rise, F-actin remodeling, and pMLC decrease. No changes in phosho-ERK were observed, although we could determine that RhoA undergoes activation. Our results suggested that active RhoA is not involved in the intercellular gap formation. Overall, the findings of this study support the view that, differently to renal epithelial cells, in BCE cells PMPD determines cytoskeletal reorganization via activation of the cAMP/PKA pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据