4.7 Article

Efficient privacy-preserving data merging and skyline computation over multi-source encrypted data

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 498, 期 -, 页码 91-105

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.05.055

关键词

Leftist tree; Data comparison; Data merging; Skyline computation; Multi-source data

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efficient data merging from the significant amount of data routinely collected from various data sources is crucial in the uncovering of relevant and key information of interest (e.g., skyline). There are, however, privacy considerations during data merging and skyline operations, particularly when dealing with sensitive data (e.g., healthcare data). Existing focuses on data merging and skyline computation either do not (fully) consider data privacy or have low efficiency. Thus, in this paper, we aim to address both privacy and efficiency during data merging and skyline computations over multi-source encrypted data. Specifically, we integrate the leftist tree with public key encryption and index based skyline computation to achieve data merging and skyline computation over encrypted data. First, we design a non-interactive data comparison protocol using public key encryption technique. This allows us to compare encrypted and outsourced data under a single cloud server instead of two non-colluding cloud servers in previous studies. Then, we combine the leftist tree with public key encryption to achieve privacy-preserving data merging with high efficiency, namely, O(log(2)(n(1) + n(2))) computational complexity for merging two leftist trees of sizes n(1) and n(2). Third, we present an index and leftist tree based skyline computation algorithm, which can efficiently perform skyline query over the merged encrypted data. Then, detailed security analysis and performance evaluation demonstrate that our scheme is both secure and efficient for data merging and skyline computation. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据