4.7 Article

Diesel fuel combustion by spraying in a superheated steam jet

期刊

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 192, 期 -, 页码 154-169

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.04.027

关键词

Burner; Diesel fuel; Superheated steam; Fuel dispersion; Experimental studies; Flame temperature; Calorimetric measurements; Composition of combustion products

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [18-79-10134]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [18-79-10134] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper experimentally studies the process of liquid hydrocarbon combustion by spraying a jet of superheated steam using diesel fuel as an example. A laboratory burner sample (with a power of up to 20 kW) is used to assess the effect of the operating parameters on the characteristics of the combustion process in the presence of superheated steam: heat generation, the composition of the combustion, products and the flame temperature. The dependences of the main calorific and environmental indicators of the burner on the temperature and flow rates of superheated steam and fuel are found. The maximal completeness of fuel combustion reaches 98.6%. With an increase in the mass fraction of the steam (up to 50%), a decrease in the content of nitrogen oxides is observed. The minimal contents of carbon monoxide are CO = 5 mg/kWh, while the level of nitrogen oxides is maximal but does not exceed 90 mg/kWh, corresponding to class 3 by EN 267. Compared with heated air jet technology, steam gasification technology has significant environmental advantages. The results are in demand for scientific substantiation of energy efficient and environmentally friendly ways of utilising substandard liquid hydrocarbons with heat production, verification of the mathematical model, and numerical simulation of the process. The results can be used for the development of the energy efficient and environmentally friendly technologies of liquid hydrocarbon waste utilisation with the production of heat energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据