4.5 Article

KIF1A variants are a frequent cause of autosomal dominant hereditary spastic paraplegia

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 40-49

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0497-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Radboud university medical centre, ZonMW
  2. Bioblast Pharma
  3. Hersenstichting
  4. Stichting Panta Rhei
  5. Dutch Epilepsy Foundation
  6. COFRA foundation
  7. European Community's Horizon 2020 Programme [668353]
  8. Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (Veni scheme)
  9. Thierry Latran Foundation
  10. ALS Foundation Netherlands
  11. Shire

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Variants in the KIF1A gene can cause autosomal recessive spastic paraplegia 30, autosomal recessive hereditary sensory neuropathy, or autosomal (de novo) dominant mental retardation type 9. More recently, variants in KIF1A have also been described in a few cases with autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia. Here, we describe 20 KIF1A variants in 24 patients from a clinical exome sequencing cohort of 347 individuals with a mostly 'pure' spastic paraplegia. In these patients, spastic paraplegia was slowly progressive and mostly pure, but with a highly variable disease onset (0-57 years). Segregation analyses showed a de novo occurrence in seven cases, and a dominant inheritance pattern in 11 families. The motor domain of KIF1A is a hotspot for disease causing variants in autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia, similar to mental retardation type 9 and recessive spastic paraplegia type 30. However, unlike these allelic disorders, dominant spastic paraplegia was also caused by loss-of-function variants outside this domain in six families. Finally, three missense variants were outside the motor domain and need further characterization. In conclusion, KIF1A variants are a frequent cause of autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia in our cohort (6-7%). The identification of KIF1A loss-of-function variants suggests haploinsufficiency as a possible mechanism in autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据