4.7 Article

Mediated food and hydrodynamics on the ingestion of microplastics by Daphnia magna

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 251, 期 -, 页码 434-441

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.034

关键词

Microplastics; Ingestion; Hydrodynamics; Filtration capacity; Daphnia magna

资金

  1. University of Girona [MPCUdG2016]
  2. INNOQUA project from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program [689817]
  3. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [689817] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is consensus on the need to study the potential impact microplastics (MP) have on freshwater planktonic organisms. It is not yet fully understood how MP enter the aquatic food web or the effect they have on all the trophic levels. As a result of the potential for MP to accumulate throughout food webs, there is increasing interest in evaluating their fate in a variety of environmental conditions. This study investigated the variability in the ingestion of MP to food ratios and the exposed time of MP to Daphnia magna in non-sheared and sheared conditions. The sheared environment provided Daphnia magna with the conditions for optimal filtering capacity. Regardless of the ratios of MP concentration to food concentration (MP:Food), the filtration capacity of the Daphnia magna was enhanced in the sheared experiments. In both the sheared and non-sheared experiments, filtration capacity decreased when the ratios of MP to food concentration and the exposure times to MP were increased. Mortality was mainly enhanced in the non-sheared conditions at higher MP concentrations and exposure times to MP. No mortality was found in the sheared conditions for the exposure times studied. Therefore, in aquatic systems that undergo constant low sheared conditions, Daphnia magna can survive longer when exposed to MP than in calm conditions, provided food concentrations do not limit their capacity to filter. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据