4.7 Article

Entropy generation and exergy destruction in condensing steam flow through turbine blade with surface roughness

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 196, 期 -, 页码 1089-1104

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.06.066

关键词

Steam turbine; Non-equilibrium condensation; Entropy generation; Exergy destruction; Transition SST model; Surface roughness

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51876143, 61873184, 61627803]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [16JCQNJC03700, 18JCQNJC74500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the steam turbine, the wetness loss due to vapor condensation is one of the most crucial losses at low-pressure stage. This study focused on entropy generation and exergy destruction of condensing steam flow in turbine blade with the roughness. The governing equations including entropy transport equation combined with condensation model, transition SST model and roughness correlation were established and verified by experiments and theory. Flow field behaviors, such as wetness fraction, intermittency and turbulent viscosity distributions, controlled by the deviation angle were obtained to evaluate effects of back pressure ratio and surface roughness. The mass-averaged wetness fraction at outlet was also extracted considering the influence of uneven mass flux. Finally, each part of entropy generation derived from viscous, heat conduction, phase change and aerodynamic losses and exergy destruction ratio were analyzed. Research shows that roughness plays an important part in the intermittency and turbulent viscosity. The mass-averaged wetness fraction at outlet sharply drops with back pressure ratio but slightly decreases with the roughness. With the roughness rising or back pressure dropping, the entropy generation grows resulting in more exergy destruction. The maximum value of the total entropy generation is 84.520 J.kg(-1).K-1, corresponding exergy destruction is 25.187 kJ.kg(-1) and exergy destruction ratio is 4.43%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据