4.5 Article

Supercritical CO2 Exposure-Induced Surface Property, Pore Structure, and Adsorption Capacity Alterations in Various Rank Coals

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 12, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en12173294

关键词

super-critical CO2; coal rank; surface property; pore structure; adsorption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51674047, 51611140122]
  2. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51625401]
  3. Special Youth Project of Science and Technology Innovation Enterprise Capital of China Coal Technology Engineering Group Co., Ltd. [2018-2-QN016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon dioxide (CO2) has been used to replace coal seam gas for recovery enhancement and carbon sequestration. To better understand the alternations of coal seam in response to CO2 sequestration, the properties of four different coals before and after supercritical CO2 (ScCO2) exposure at 40 degrees C and 16 MPa were analyzed with Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), low-pressure nitrogen, and CO2 adsorption methods. Further, high-pressure CO2 adsorption isotherms were performed at 40 degrees C using a gravimetric method. The results indicate that the density of functional groups and mineral matters on coal surface decreased after ScCO2 exposure, especially for low-rank coal. With ScCO2 exposure, only minimal changes in pore shape were observed for various rank coals. However, the micropore specific surface area (SSA) and pore volume increased while the values for mesopore decreased as determined by low-pressure N-2 and CO2 adsorption. The combined effects of surface property and pore structure alterations lead to a higher CO2 adsorption capacity at lower pressures but lower CO2 adsorption capacity at higher pressures. Langmuir model fitting shows a decreasing trend in monolayer capacity after ScCO2 exposure, indicating an elimination of the adsorption sites. The results provide new insights for the long-term safety for the evaluation of CO2-enhanced coal seam gas recovery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据