4.3 Article

Naturally occurring osteoarthritis in male mice with an extended lifespan

期刊

CONNECTIVE TISSUE RESEARCH
卷 61, 期 1, 页码 95-103

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/03008207.2019.1635590

关键词

Osteoarthritis; healthspan; lifespan; aging; cartilage

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging [RO1 AG044034, U01 AG022303]
  2. Glenn Medical Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether pharmacologic treatments or genotypes shown to prolong murine lifespan ameliorate the severity of age-associated osteoarthritis. Materials and Methods: Male UM-HET3 mice were fed diets containing 17-alpha-estradiol, acarbose, nordihydroguaiaretic acid, or control diet per the National Institute on Aging Interventions Testing Program (ITP) protocol. Findings were compared to genetically long-lived male Ames dwarf mice. Stifles were analyzed histologically with articular cartilage structure (ACS) and safranin O scoring as well as with quantitative histomorphometry. Results: Depending on the experimental group, ITP mice were between 450 and 1150 days old at the time of necropsy and 12-15 animals were studied per group. Two age groups (450 and 750 days) with 16-20 animals per group were used for Ames dwarf studies. No differences were found in the ACS or safranin O scores between treatment and control groups in the ITP study. There was high variability in most of the histologic outcome measures. For example, the older UM-HET3 controls had ACS scores of 6.1 +/- 5.8 (mean +/- SD) and Saf O scores of 6.8 +/- 5.6. Nevertheless, 17-alpha-estradiol mice had larger areas and widths of subchondral bone compared to controls, and dwarf mice had less subchondral bone area and width and less articular cartilage necrosis than non-dwarf controls. Conclusions: UM-HET3 mice developed age-related OA but with a high degree of variability and without a significant effect of the tested ITP treatments. High variability was also seen in the Ames dwarf mice but differences in several measures suggested some protection from OA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据